Great Teacher Prompt Task Cards for Guided Math Lessons

Posted on February 22, 2012. Filed under: Assessment, Guided math, Mathematical Proficiency | Tags: , , , , , |


Here are some task cards to use during guided math lessons.  They will help you to think about how you are framing activities and phrasing questions.  They are also great discussion starters during grade level meetings to talk about questions that scaffold thinking and help to implement the mathematical practices.

Happy Mathing,

Dr. Nicki

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Mathematical Proficiency for Everyone!

Posted on August 16, 2011. Filed under: Classroom environment, Differentiated Instruction, Elementary math, Mathematical Proficiency | Tags: , , , , , |


Is it possible to do something in your math class this year, so that everybody develops proficiency?  David Borenstein raises this question and others in his NY times article about math. What happens if we truly believe that everyone can learn math, and that we have the keys to that?  How does the paradigm for teaching and learning math then switch?  How would things change IF we had no doubt that everyone can, will and must do math proficiently?  And we really believed it was possible with some instructional interventions, masterful scaffolding and appropriate math tools? Think about it, seriously and read the entire article here.

Happy Mathing,

Dr. Nicki

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Scaffolding In Guided Math Groups: Part 2

Posted on December 27, 2010. Filed under: Differentiated Instruction, During the Guided Math Lesson, Graphic Organizers | Tags: , , , , |


There are many different types of scaffolds.  We should be sure to use a variety of scaffolds to accommodate our students (Alibali, 2006).  For example, we use scaffolds to accommodate the readiness levels of learners, novice, apprentice, practitioner and expert.  But, we also use scaffolds to accommodate the progression of knowledge among learners, so the apprentice might start with one type of scaffold and then move on to a more complex one later.  Hartman (2002) states that scaffolds may include models, cues, prompts, hints, partial solutions, think aloud modeling and direct instruction.

A procedural facilitator can be a hint, cue card or partially completed example (cited in Van der Stuyf, 2002). For example, when teaching rounding, the graphic organizer with the hills on it and the numbers tell students what to do (GOOGLE ANTHILL NUMBER ROUNDOFF/ http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/3420 ).  Another example for rounding  is a colored number grid http://www.superteacherworksheets.com/paper/hundredschart-rounding2.pdf Here is another example of a graphic organizer being used as a scaffold for rounding.  This one uses the number line http://www.superteacherworksheets.com/rounding/rounding-nearest-hundred-d.pdf Also, poems like the rounding poem http://www.proteacher.org/a/79954_Rounding_Rap.html can be considered a scaffold (a type of cue card) because they give prompts to what should happen. Here is another example of a cue card type of scaffold.  Notice the prompts at the top of the sheet. [you have to copy and insert url into your browser directly to get to  site]  http://math.about.com/library/5roundinga.pdf

References:

Hartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding & Cooperative Learning. Human Learning and Instruction (pp. 23-69).  New York:  City College of City University of New York.

Google: Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy (Van der Stuyf,  2002)

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Teaching staying power, sticktoitness and the right attitude: Mathematical Disposition and Guided Math Lessons (Part 5)

Posted on October 20, 2010. Filed under: Assessment, Classroom environment, Guided math, Mathematical Proficiency | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , |


Polya (1969) [the grandfather of problem solving] states: This is the general aim of mathematics teaching – to develop in each student as much as possible the good mental habits of tackling any kind of problem. You should develop the whole personality of the student and mathematics teaching should especially develop thinking. Mathematics teaching could also develop clarity and staying power. It could also develop character to some extent but most important is the development of thinking. My point of view is that the most important part of thinking that is developed in mathematics is the right attitude in tackling problems, in treating problems. (Part II, pp. 5-7) (cited in Merz, 2009).

Polya provokes us to think about what we do everyday.  He says that we are charged with developing in students ” the good mental habits of tackling any kind of problem.”  We have to come up with rich math tasks so students can engage in this type of thinking.  And, dare I say most of those types of problems are not on page 47 in problems 3-10:)  Real problems, with real contexts helps students to see that math is a real subject.

What do you think of his statement that we should “develop the whole personality of the child and math should develop thinking?”  This idea makes math class look very different from many teach, test and move on scenarios.  If we are teaching to develop personality and thinking, then what on earth does that look like?

Polya goes on to state that teaching math is about teaching character, staying power and the right attitude.

Let’s all think about how we write that into our lesson plans!

References:

Merz, A. (2009). Teaching for Mathematical Dispositions
as Well as for Understanding: The Difference Between Reacting to and
Advocating for Dispositional Learning. Journal of Educational Thought
Vol. 43, No. 1, 65-78.

Polya, G. (1969). The goals of mathematics education. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.mathematicallysane.com/analysis/polya.asp.
Unpublished videotaped lecture presented to T.C. O’Brien’s
mathematics education students

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Mathematical Disposition: More than an attitude (using guided math groups to foster the many aspects) Part 4

Posted on October 19, 2010. Filed under: Assessment, Classroom environment, Guided Math Introduction, Mathematical Proficiency | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |


Much has been written about mathematical dispositions or ways of thinking and being NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989, 2000) and others (e.g., Maher, 2005; De Corte, Verschaffel, & Op’T Eynde, 2000: Polya, 1969).  The research tells us that mathematical disposition is much more than an attitude.  It is about ways of thinking, doing, being and seeing math.  It includes confidence, flexibility, perseverance, interest, inventiveness, appreciation, reflection and monitoring (Merz, 2009).

Given that, how do you cultivate each one of these in your class?

  1. What do you do to boost students’ confidence?  Name 2 things.  What could you do? Name 1 more.  How might you do this in a guided math group?  Since you only have a few students in a group, you can attend more individually to each one.  One way to do this is to give problems that they can do.  Success breeds success and confidence.

2. What do you do to help foster flexibility? This idea of thinking in many different ways?  Do you engage in ongoing strategy talk?  Do you have a culture of sharing in your class that goes beyond the answer but talks about how people got the answer or didn’t get it?

3. What do you do to build perseverance?  How do you teach that?  How do you do that?  So that students’ perseverance levels increase over time?

4. What do you do to spark interest?  How do you connect math to their lives? Where is the math in Pokeman or Dragonball Z?

5. What do you do to encourage inventiveness?  Do we publicly celebrate inventive thinking?  How do we get our students to think hard about the math their doing and take risks?

6. What do you do to cultivate appreciation of math?  Do you make connections to real life situations that are important to them so students see that math really does matter?

7. How often do we get them to reflect about the math they are learning?  Do we consistently use entrance and/or exit slips so they can think about their learning? Do we use individual pupil responses like thumbs up, thumbs down or sideways to check in with them?  Do we use red, green, and yellow slips so they can give us immediate feedback about speeding up the lesson, slowing down the lesson or stopping to explain further?  Do we ask them to do oral and or written reflections on their quizzes and tests and make plans to learn what they are still struggling with?  You can do this in small guided math groups! This is an excellent space for these types of discussions.

8. How do we get student’s to monitor their learning?  Do they have action plans that they reflect on?  Who is responsible for knowing where they are?  Just us?  Think about how powerful it would be if they knew too! And if their parents knew, more than just a few times a year.  The more people who know, the more likely the student is to get there!  Think of the power of everybody being on board.  What does a consistent inclusive monitoring system look like?

References:

Alice Merz

Journal of Educational Thought
Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, 65-78.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )

5 Steps to Teaching Math Greatly

Posted on May 29, 2010. Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , |


1.  Enjoy it. Find the fun in numbers.  Because if you Don’t, your students NEVER will:)

2. Learn it. (Study, buy the algebra book or the geometry book….by it in cartoons, buy it in the “for dummies” series,but it in the “painless” series, buy it in the middle school version, however you can get through it…but by a content strand at a time and master it).

3.  Find a great, fun, engaging way to teach it.

4.  Go to a math conference (local, regional, state, or national) http://www.nctm.org/meetings/

5.  Commit to “stretching your own pedagogy,” –often.

See some of the books:

http://books.google.com/books?id=nM9aj9wiMSUC&dq=painless+fractions&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=#

http://books.google.com/books?id=bFj3ZWxNkgIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=geometry+the+easy+way&ei=f0cBTPL4MYnazQS_x7CmDA&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=sjKR7Rqt12kC&printsec=frontcover&dq=algebra+for+dummies&ei=oUcBTJfXNI7YywTH6fD8DA&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Who should the teacher work with during guided math lessons – novices, apprentices or the experts?

Posted on January 18, 2010. Filed under: Guided Math Introduction | Tags: |


I think it is very important for teachers to work with small guided math groups with all the different students, not just the lowest performing.  Everybody needs the teacher’s attention at some point to push them to the next skill level.  Classroom assistants are a great help, but they should not be the only person who works with a particular group.  By the end of the week, I think it is important that the teacher has connected with all of the students in some form or another.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...